Waiting for peer review results is like awaiting sentencing , years of research hanging on the editor's word. What if you could get peer review comments before submission, and fix the problems in advance? APC makes this possible with a mock peer review.
Everything a journal reviewer would do , done for you, five days before you submit.
Reviews follow top-journal standards, matching the rigor your manuscript will meet at submission.
Our experts examine your paper the way a peer reviewer would , identifying the weaknesses reviewers actually flag.
A written report with concrete fixes, so you can solve problems before they become rejections.
Every manuscript review follows a structured evaluation framework based on the academic quality standards expected by reputable indexed journals.
Our reviews follow a rigorous evaluation framework aligned with the standards and expectations of indexed academic journals.
Our reviewers examine study design, research methodology, significance, ethical compliance, and data analysis.
We evaluate clarity, organisation, supporting evidence, conclusions, and the strength of the literature review.
Two elements make up every report: simulated peer review comments with actionable suggestions, and , if you have a target journal , a compatibility assessment.
We recruited 42 participants1 over a six-week period2. Baseline characteristics were recorded for all subjects, and participants were randomised to either the intervention or control group.
Results indicate a significant improvement3 in the intervention group across all measured metabolic markers. These findings align with prior literature on dietary interventions in similar populations4.
Sample size appears underpowered for the effect claimed. Please justify with a power analysis or acknowledge as a limitation.
Six weeks is short for metabolic endpoints. Clarify follow-up duration or discuss washout risk.
"Significant" is used ambiguously , specify statistical vs. clinical significance, and report effect sizes.
"Similar populations" is vague. Cite specific studies and note any demographic differences.
One flat rate per reviewer. All tiers delivered in 5 business days. No per-word pricing, no hidden fees.
Download a sample pre-submission peer review report from the report preview section above to see exactly what a completed review looks like.
It's a simulated peer review , before you submit your paper to a journal. Experienced reviewers examine your manuscript using the same standards a journal peer reviewer would apply, and give you a detailed report of strengths, weaknesses, and required improvements. You get the reviewer's-eye view while you still have time to fix problems.
No. Pre-Submission Peer Review is priced per reviewer, not per word. A 3,000-word paper and a 9,000-word paper cost the same at each tier , $272 for 1 reviewer, $535 for 2, or $799 for 3.
Yes , take a look at our Peer Review Lite service, which provides a focused technical pre-check at a lower price point and shorter turnaround. It's ideal as a first pass before committing to a full multi-reviewer panel.
Real journals typically use 2–3 reviewers because no single reviewer catches everything. Two reviewers bring different expertise (e.g., a methodologist and a subject specialist) and cross-validate each other. Three reviewers cover methodology, subject, and ethics , the broadest coverage of concerns your target journal is likely to raise.
To get started, please submit your complete manuscript (Word, LaTeX, or PDF) and specify your field of study. If you have a preferred or target journal, you may also share its name so we can assess how well your manuscript aligns with the journal's scope and publication requirements.
Submit your manuscript for a simulated peer review panel and get actionable feedback within 5 business days , before you submit to the journal.
*All third-party trademarks (including logos and icons) of journals/publishers referred to on this website remain the property of their respective owners. Use of third-party trademarks does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party trademarks are for identification purposes only and shall be considered fair use under The Trademarks Law. Purchase of our services does not guarantee acceptance or publication by any journal. Editor and expert images displayed on this website are of real individuals and are used with their consent.